Page 93 of 99 FirstFirst ... 43839192939495 ... LastLast
Results 921 to 930 of 982
Like Tree582Likes

Thread: The Rise of The Alt Right

  1. #921
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    509
    Quote Originally Posted by SophicDrippins View Post
    What do they do with the brown people? If white people need welfare, then they wouldn't seem very superior.
    Isn't that the purpose of nationalism? To incentivize Non-Whites to leave the country like paying them big money in order to revoke their citizenship status. As for Whites needing welfare, hasn't that usually been the case right now? Don't White countries have the best welfare system compared to say like Asian countries? Welfare has been around the past 70 years and look at the amazing things Whites have accomplished since then. It's only when you bring in more Non-Whites is when it becomes problematic. Non-Whites are more of a burden than Whites in a country mostly of Whites.
    "Change is almost always negative. Things degenerate." - Woody Allen

  2. #922
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    509
    Quote Originally Posted by serenesam View Post
    Isn't that the purpose of nationalism? To incentivize Non-Whites to leave the country like paying them big money in order to revoke their citizenship status. As for Whites needing welfare, hasn't that usually been the case right now? Don't White countries have the best welfare system compared to say like Asian countries? Welfare has been around the past 70 years and look at the amazing things Whites have accomplished since then. It's only when you bring in more Non-Whites is when it becomes problematic. Non-Whites are more of a burden than Whites in a country mostly of Whites.
    So in other words, welfare is better implemented when you have nationalism and only nationalism.
    SophicDrippins likes this.
    "Change is almost always negative. Things degenerate." - Woody Allen

  3. #923
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    509
    Some people keep complaining about “White Imperialism.” Between White Imperialism, Asian Imperialism, and Non-White Imperialism, White Imperialism is still better because it is like picking the lesser of the two evils. Many lower human beings reflecting lower cognitive and emotional function don’t know how to govern themselves to the highest potenial possible and so they contribute to dysgenics because they are like children or savages. Then some people may say that well we don’t need any form or kind of Imperialism whatsoever but that then can go into a long discussion about the nature of human beings. Like many things in life, very few things are totally correct or totally incorrect. Some people say that humans are inherently good yet others say the opposite. I would argue that you do need some form of Imperialism in the same way that you do need some form of hierarchy, domination, and leadership. When you don’t allow for certain beings to lead the way, things either stall or degenerate. It really is all that simple.

    Furthermore, lower human beings shouldn’t be in possession of certain technological advancements because they could use it in a threatening manner/way. They could be like children and use it as a form of extortion or blackmail or, they could simply just be straight out savages and use it spontaneously without any reasoning whatsoever. This is why exclusionism is a necessity and just like I said in some other place, there will always be at the minimum two kinds of groups or categories of people on a macrolevel. There is no way around this and there can never be a way around it. Similarly, going back to the nature of human beings about whether humans in general are good or evil, the answer is like that some are and some aren’t and this is where I think MBTI comes into play when you analyze the Fi-Te (or Te-Fi) pair functions versus the Fe-Ti (or Ti-Fe) pair functions.
    SophicDrippins likes this.
    "Change is almost always negative. Things degenerate." - Woody Allen

  4. #924
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Northwest Wisconsin
    Posts
    2,058
    Quote Originally Posted by serenesam View Post
    Some people keep complaining about “White Imperialism.” Between White Imperialism, Asian Imperialism, and Non-White Imperialism, White Imperialism is still better because it is like picking the lesser of the two evils. Many lower human beings reflecting lower cognitive and emotional function don’t know how to govern themselves to the highest potenial possible and so they contribute to dysgenics because they are like children or savages. Then some people may say that well we don’t need any form or kind of Imperialism whatsoever but that then can go into a long discussion about the nature of human beings. Like many things in life, very few things are totally correct or totally incorrect. Some people say that humans are inherently good yet others say the opposite. I would argue that you do need some form of Imperialism in the same way that you do need some form of hierarchy, domination, and leadership. When you don’t allow for certain beings to lead the way, things either stall or degenerate. It really is all that simple.

    Furthermore, lower human beings shouldn’t be in possession of certain technological advancements because they could use it in a threatening manner/way. They could be like children and use it as a form of extortion or blackmail or, they could simply just be straight out savages and use it spontaneously without any reasoning whatsoever. This is why exclusionism is a necessity and just like I said in some other place, there will always be at the minimum two kinds of groups or categories of people on a macrolevel. There is no way around this and there can never be a way around it. Similarly, going back to the nature of human beings about whether humans in general are good or evil, the answer is like that some are and some aren’t and this is where I think MBTI comes into play when you analyze the Fi-Te (or Te-Fi) pair functions versus the Fe-Ti (or Ti-Fe) pair functions.
    When you mention 'lower people' does that also include those of any skin color who are selectively ignorant, who can't give an opine on any issue that didn't come from their God or chosen leader? You know, Sheeple......?.....or some might say Republicans or Democrats depending on 'which tribe' you may subscribe too....
    HAL9000 and Ernest like this.

  5. #925
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    509
    Quote Originally Posted by droneBEE View Post
    When you mention 'lower people' does that also include those of any skin color who are selectively ignorant, who can't give an opine on any issue that didn't come from their God or chosen leader? You know, Sheeple......?.....or some might say Republicans or Democrats depending on 'which tribe' you may subscribe too....
    No not really because the average will help offset any potential problems associated with a particular race.
    "Change is almost always negative. Things degenerate." - Woody Allen

  6. #926
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    771
    Quote Originally Posted by serenesam View Post
    Isn't that the purpose of nationalism? To incentivize Non-Whites to leave the country like paying them big money in order to revoke their citizenship status.
    Yeah, I suppose so, but it's a lot like a pet that you don't want anymore. If you can't shoot it, then you have to take care of it because throwing it out in the wild isn't ethical. Once something becomes dependent, you can't uproot it and expect much. I think that's the basis for divorce law with alimony.

    As for Whites needing welfare, hasn't that usually been the case right now? Don't White countries have the best welfare system compared to say like Asian countries?
    I'm not sure. The Japs have some nice healthcare that's sorta socialized, but they are nationalists. The commie asian countries merely have jerks running the show and that makes it hard to judge what the whole population would do in a democracy. The asians are reportedly a little smarter than whites, so they should be as empathetic as whites.

    Japan spends 23% of its GDP on social expenditures compared to 19% for the US. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welfar..._and_education

    I'm not sure if that has anything to do with their defeat in WW2, but probably so.

    Welfare has been around the past 70 years and look at the amazing things Whites have accomplished since then. It's only when you bring in more Non-Whites is when it becomes problematic. Non-Whites are more of a burden than Whites in a country mostly of Whites.
    Michio Kaku credits many of those amazing things to the H1B visa because the US imports talent from the rest of the world. I think what matters is which class of people you import. If people are crawling under fences, then they probably aren't going to contribute to the average iq of the country.

    I think it's cool to preserve the white heritage, but when you justify it by intelligence or this n that, then it becomes more difficult to defend the position.

    And on that note, this brown guy named Sharkee led me to believe that the declining innovation rate used to determine that people are not as smart as the Victorians could be wrong. The innovation rate (# of inventions / population) may be declining because it's getting progressively harder to invent new things and not necessarily because the population has been water-down.



    Just when I thought I had everything figured out, another variable came into play.

  7. #927
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    771
    Quote Originally Posted by serenesam View Post
    So in other words, welfare is better implemented when you have nationalism and only nationalism.
    I think that is true because one country can't provide welfare to the whole world.

  8. #928
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    771
    Quote Originally Posted by serenesam View Post
    Furthermore, lower human beings shouldn’t be in possession of certain technological advancements because they could use it in a threatening manner/way.
    Reminds me of the computer they gave to some monkeys hoping to eventually get the complete work of Shakespeare, but instead they got mainly the same letters typed over and over until the computer was destroyed and eventually used as a toilet.

  9. #929
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Northwest Wisconsin
    Posts
    2,058
    Quote Originally Posted by SophicDrippins View Post
    Reminds me of the computer they gave to some monkeys hoping to eventually get the complete work of Shakespeare, but instead they got mainly the same letters typed over and over until the computer was destroyed and eventually used as a toilet.
    Yeah....your unintended analogy is uncanny......ever since the fascists and haters arrived on this site......That's what this place is beginning to look like....a toilet...

    I suppose someone will offer both of our resident Nazi's (S & s) some thanks for that.........:roll eyes: Good job, good job......what';s next?

  10. #930
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    771
    Quote Originally Posted by droneBEE View Post
    Yeah....your unintended analogy is uncanny......
    It wasn't unintended.

    ever since the fascists and haters arrived on this site......That's what this place is beginning to look like....a toilet...
    Fascist - a person who is very intolerant or domineering in a particular area.

    That looks like you. You're intolerant of people wanting to stay to their own.

    Good job, good job......
    That's what I'm saying.

    what';s next?
    Um, well, since you asked... Look what a toilet this city has become:



    Detroit Is A Stark Reminder Peak America Was Over 50 Years Ago | Zero Hedge

Page 93 of 99 FirstFirst ... 43839192939495 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
web statistics
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1